Bbc what type of thinker are you




















Related Topics. More Brain Quizzes. Is there even a point in living without a brain? Is it even possible to exist without a brain? You're only able to read this because you have a brain, neither would have this quiz existed. Except for my existentialism, the Questions: 14 Attempts: Last updated: Apr 27, Sample Question. Brain stem.

Did you know that the brain contains more neurons than the stars in the galaxy? These are some of the things we were able to cover in class this past semester, and with the finals around the corner, there is a need to Both of the above are examples of where computational thinking has been used to solve a complex problem:.

Thinking computationally Thinking computationally is not programming. If all of you like different things, you would need to decide: what you could do where you could go who wants to do what what you have previously done that has been a success in the past how much money you have and the cost of any of the options what the weather might be doing how much time you have From this information, you and your friends could decide more easily where to go and what to do — in order to keep most of your friends happy.

Depending on the game, in order to complete a level you would need to know: what items you need to collect, how you can collect them, and how long you have in which to collect them where the exit is and the best route to reach it in the quickest time possible what kinds of enemies there are and their weak points From these details you can work out a strategy for completing the level in the most efficient way.

Both of the above are examples of where computational thinking has been used to solve a complex problem: each complex problem was broken down into several small decisions and steps eg where to go, how to complete the level — decomposition only the relevant details were focused on eg weather, location of exit — abstraction knowledge of previous similar problems was used pattern recognition Let us know.

Update Progress. Latest Episodes All Episodes. Mark Wright. Robert Lindsay. Naomie Harris. Julian Clary. Jane Horrocks. Barbara Windsor. Jeremy Paxman. Nigella Lawson. David Dickinson.

Moira Stuart. Lesley Garrett. Jeremy Clarkson. Colin Jackson. Sue Johnston. Sheila Hancock. Jeremy Irons. Alex Scott. Didn't watch it. You also need to accept that, while skill can predict your overall trajectory across many tournaments , your performance at any particular moment is still the victim of chance.

Using a simulated stock market, she found that the more people overestimated the importance of their own skill, rather than luck, the less flexible their decision making became — relying too much on their initial hunches without learning from actual patterns in the data. To avoid that trap, you need to start thinking probabilistically. In poker, that means estimating the odds that someone would have a better or worse hand than you, and adapting your decision making accordingly.

Given the high degree of uncertainty, the poker player must also appreciate the concept of variance — the range of possible outcomes from any decision.

This means that even if you make a big win, your underlying reasoning could have been flawed, and even if you lose, you might have been making the most logical decision based on the information at hand. Poker is a game of probability — being able to grasp the role of luck in a winning or losing hand is important for good players Credit: Alamy. In each case, a good probabilistic thinker would be able to recognise the role of luck in those outcomes while objectively analysing the quality of the decision-making underneath — while people with a poor grasp of uncertainty would read too much into their successes or failings.

It is the quality of the reasoning, rather the outcome , that matters if you want to improve your long-term performance. Examples of tilting could include that despair that comes from a string of bad luck, which causes you to gamble more furiously to make up for your losses, or it could be the overconfidence that comes from a win.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000